The other shoe has dropped with the long-awaited release of new weight classes from the NFHS Wrestling Rules Committee.
Beginning with the 2011-12 season the fourteen weight classes will look like this: 106, 113, 120, 126, 132, 138, 145, 152, 160, 170, 182, 195, 220 and 285.
Of the fourteen classes, only four remain unmolested: ’45, ’52 ’60 and 285. Ten have been massaged out of previous weights, with apparent homage to different grappling eras. One new weight class has been created at the top end of the lineup, at the expense of a middle weight where three classifications have become two.
In a move that surprised absolutely no one, the 103-pound class was “super-sized” to 106. This long-anticipated action follows a quarter century creep of the entry-level weight class from 98 pounds, which used to be 95.
The rest of the classes follow suit with 112 – a traditional weight since Socrates oversaw workouts between Homer and Ulysses – becoming 113; 120 returns after a 39-year absence; 132 legislated in for 1973 and out after 1988, returns, as does 138, a victim of the 1988 upheaval.
Wrestlers who competed at 171 will have to cut an extra pound as the class is now 170. The 189-pound class, which used to be 185, which used to be 180, is now 182, making room between 220 – nee 215 – for the creation of the 195-pound weight class, whose presence signals doom in the middle where 130-135-140 were melded into 132 and 138.
This change will be felt locally as teams with a large upperweight presence – think Solanco – will benefit while teams that are stacked in the middle – think Manheim Township – will be hurt.
“The change in weight classes resulted from a three-to-four year process utilizing data from the National Wrestling Coaches Association (NWCA) Optimal Performance Calculator,” said Dale Pleimann, chair of the NFHS Wrestling Rules Committee and former assistant executive director of the Missouri State High School Activities Association.
“The rules committee was able to analyze data from almost 200,000 wrestlers across the country, with the goal to create weight classes that have approximately seven percent of the wrestlers in each weight class.
“Throughout the process, each state association was kept completely informed and was provided multiple opportunities for input. The results of the last survey of each state association indicated that the majority of states favored a change, and the committee listened and acted accordingly.”
Apparently nobody’s state committee listened to the outcry to leave 103 alone
The weight class changes were tabled by the NFHS last year, but reappeared this year with the encouragement of state governing bodies including the PIAA, which heartily supported the weight class changes.
And speaking of changes, there’s more.
Do you use the Figure 4 hold?
Not any more.
Although previously illegal to use on the body, or on a leg, the Figure 4, when applied to a wrestler’s head, was legal as part of a pinning combination, usually in conjunction with an arm bar. Now, concerned with the risk of injury potential, the committee has moved to outlaw any use of the Figure 4.
In a sop to the proposal submitted last year by our own Bob Derr, Rule 2-1-3, was modified to make the two-inch wide outer limit of the circle inbounds. Derr had proposed to bring the scholastic rule in line with the collegiate rule, which allows any action that begins inbounds to continue despite crossing the boundary.
While Derr’s idea died, judged too dangerous to implement in small high school gyms, the recent change will at least open up the pinning possibilities within any part of the 2-inch-wide line which marks the outer limit of in bounds.
Other changes include the consequences of a second injury timeout at the start of the third period of wrestling; the development of rules regarding multi-team dual meets and team-formatted tournaments; officials’ positioning during injury and blood time stoppages and officials’ clerical duties beyond the end of the meet through the completion of any reports required from actions that occurred while the referees had jurisdiction. Also, the language of Rule 6-2-2 was changed from “forfeit” to “disqualification” to reflect correct terminology.
Not being on a first-name basis with 6-2-2, we can only assume this is a harmless change.
Finally, points of emphasis adopted by the committee for 2011-12 include communicable diseases, injury time-outs, coach/referee conferences, and concussion recognition and management.
That last note regarding concussions, while a laudable idea, will be a contentious issue, mark my words.