LANCMARKETPLACELANCSPORTSLANCMOMSREALTY WIZARDAUTO WIZARDLANCJOBSBOOCOO AUCTION
Search Site:

A dog-law dodge

Intelligencer Journal: In Our View
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Mar 09, 2011 04:10

One of the significant accomplishments of the recently ended Rendell administration was toughened state regulation of commercial dog kennels in Pennsylvania.

The state, and in particular Lancaster County, had become nationally notorious as the home of puppy mills — factory kennels in which dogs were bred under often inhumane conditions. It was a black eye that only now is fading.

The new state rules mandated, for the first time, cage sizes, exercise time and mandatory veterinary care for large breeding operations. Additional rules, covering temperature and ventilation in kennels, will become effective later this year.

Rather than meet the new regulations, many large kennel operators have closed shop or sharply reduced the number of dogs they breed annually. According to the state Department of Agriculture, the number of large commercial kennels in Pennsylvania has dropped from 303 before the law took effect to 87 today.

Good riddance, we say.

But then there's state Rep. Gordon Denlinger, a Republican who represents rural east and northeastern Lancaster County where kennels flourished in the past.

Denlinger appears worried that forcing these kennels out of business has cost the state "several million dollars in sales tax and ... many millions of dollars in taxable income," according to the resolution he sponsored.

Denlinger admits he has no data to support his "many millions of dollars" claim, but his proposed legislation directs the Joint State Government Commission, a state research organization, to study and review the economic impacts of the new dog law regulations.

Our guess is that few puppy mills, which often ignored zoning laws and other existing regulations, bothered with the niceties of collecting sales or payroll taxes — indeed, if they even had any employees.

We have to wonder if his legislation isn't a back door effort to get lawmakers to reconsider the dog law changes that were difficult to enact in the first place.

Denlinger denies this. He said the study might only be useful to develop tax credits to help kennel operators meet the new state standards.

But puppy mill operators should not be rewarded for past abuses. A state handout to help them get back into business isn't good for dogs or people.

Let this sleeping dog lie.


Help us improve: suggestions, corrections, clarifications, added information welcome
Reader Comments

We welcome opinions and information from all points of view. They enrich our news coverage.

We ask that your comments respect the opinions of others. Personal attacks and hate speech are not acceptable and, when reported, will be edited or removed. Offenders will be banned from making comments.

To post comments, you must provide us your real name and contact information. Sign up takes only a moment. You can do it here.

Please Sign Up Here
Our full TalkBack policy and rules appear here.

 

TalkBack comments about this article
Comment on this article
Featured Jobs

More Jobs
Click Here to create and publish your ad in minutes! Best of all, it's FREE for the next 10 days.
News and Information
News
Sports
Business
Events Calendar
Lifestyle
Marketplace
Blogs
Mobile
Talkback
Celebrations
Obituaries
Classified Advertising
Jobs
Cars/Trucks/Cycles
Real Estate
Rentals
Marketplace
Legal Notices
Place an Ad
Contact Us
Advertising
Home Delivery
Intelligencer Journal /
Lancaster New Era
Sunday News
LancasterOnline
LancSports
LancMoms
LancJobs
Services
Subscribe
Manage Your Account
e-Editions
Story Reprints
Purchase Photos
Newspapers in Education
Special Sections
Terms of Service
Press Releases
Partners
LancJobs
LancSports
LancMoms
LancMarketplace
Lancaster Farming
Entertainment Lancaster
Community Sports Desk