LANCMARKETPLACELANCSPORTSLANCMOMSREALTY WIZARDAUTO WIZARDLANCJOBSBOOCOO AUCTION
Search Site:

School District of Lancaster board member faces trial

Intelligencer Journal
Updated Sep 25, 2008 17:59
Grantville
Originally Published Sep 25, 2008 01:23
By BRETT HAMBRIGHT
Staff

A School District of Lancaster board member accused by state police of stealing a $100 bill dropped onto a casino floor is expected to stand trial.

Janelle Simms, 63, of Lancaster, waived her preliminary hearing Wednesday morning at a Dauphin County district judge's office.

Simms can either stand trial on the misdemeanor theft charge or plead guilty to picking up the money, which police allege was dropped by another patron at the Grantville casino on July 28.

According to police and court documents, Catherine Fritz of Hummelstown dropped the $100 bill inside Hollywood Casino at Penn National Race Course. Simms knew Fritz had dropped the bill but picked it up and placed it in her purse, according to an affidavit filed in the case.

After reviewing surveillance tapes that captured the incident, state police charged Simms with theft of property mislaid or lost.

Simms declined comment Wednesday evening.

In previous reports, Simms said she thought the bill was hers. She thought she had dropped it soon after making a withdrawal from an ATM at the casino, according to those reports. An affidavit filed by state Trooper Steven Heidel says Simms made eye contact with Fritz immediately after the bill was dropped and again after picking it up. Simms stared at Fritz as she placed the bill in her own purse, Heidel says in the affidavit.

E-mail: bhambright@lnpnews.com


Help us improve: suggestions, corrections, clarifications, added information welcome
Reader Comments

We welcome opinions and information from all points of view. They enrich our news coverage.

We ask that your comments respect the opinions of others. Personal attacks and hate speech are not acceptable and, when reported, will be edited or removed. Offenders will be banned from making comments.

To post comments, you must provide us your real name and contact information. Sign up takes only a moment. You can do it here.

Please Sign Up Here
Our full TalkBack policy and rules appear here.

 

TalkBack comments about this article
View full comments | Comment on this article
Hope

QUOTE (Right of Smart @ Sep 26 2008, 10:03 AM)
Hope, I hope we all get to see the video. I can't wait!

I'd like to see it too; although I still think she should be given the benefit of the doubt.

09/26/2008 10:14 am

Report Abuse
johnq

QUOTE (Hope @ Sep 26 2008, 10:14 AM)
I'd like to see it too; although I still think she should be given the benefit of the doubt.
I believe she is. That's what a trial is for, isn't it? You know, prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

09/26/2008 10:24 am

Report Abuse
Wonder

I had this conversation with kids over and over when I was working. You put your foot on the bill and then figure out whether or not it is your money. You do NOT pick the money up. If it is not yours, you get a person in charge to help you figure it out .

If she put her foot on the bill and counted the money she had just taken from the ATM, then she would have known whether or not it were her own money. Then that is what the the video would have shown her doing.

If she knew it was not her own money and kept it, anyway, then she was stealing someone else's money and the charges fit.

Usually, people complicate their own lives by not making rules.

09/26/2008 10:30 am

Report Abuse
oh geez

maybe her defense can be that she thought she was at a slot machine and won the money


09/26/2008 10:38 am

Report Abuse
Hope

QUOTE (Wonder @ Sep 26 2008, 10:30 AM)
I had this conversation with kids over and over when I was working. You put your foot on the bill and then figure out whether or not it is your money. You do NOT pick the money up. If it is not yours, you get a person in charge to help you figure it out .

If she put her foot on the bill and counted the money she had just taken from the ATM, then she would have known whether or not it were her own money. Then that is what the the video would have shown her doing.

If she knew it was not her own money and kept it, anyway, then she was stealing someone else's money and the charges fit.

Usually, people complicate their own lives by not making rules.

Maybe she didn't follow your "rules" but with the information that we were given, her assumption that the money was hers was quite reasonable. I can honestly say that I would not put my foot on the bill I would pick it up, check my money and then if I realized it wasn't mine I'd give it to someone who works there.

09/26/2008 10:42 am

Report Abuse
Featured Jobs

More Jobs
Click Here to create and publish your ad in minutes! Best of all, it's FREE for the next 10 days.
News and Information
News
Sports
Business
Events Calendar
Lifestyle
Marketplace
Blogs
Mobile
Talkback
Celebrations
Obituaries
Classified Advertising
Jobs
Cars/Trucks/Cycles
Real Estate
Rentals
Marketplace
Legal Notices
Place an Ad
Contact Us
Advertising
Home Delivery
Intelligencer Journal /
Lancaster New Era
Sunday News
LancasterOnline
LancSports
LancMoms
LancJobs
Services
Subscribe
Manage Your Account
e-Editions
Story Reprints
Purchase Photos
Newspapers in Education
Special Sections
Terms of Service
Press Releases
Partners
LancJobs
LancSports
LancMoms
LancMarketplace
Lancaster Farming
Entertainment Lancaster
Community Sports Desk